See what was reviewed before you approve
leapCAT explains quality findings, proposed fixes, residual risk, and the next customer decision instead of asking you to trust a black box.
How review evidence works
- •The customer should not need to become a reviewer to understand delivery risk.
- •leapCAT checks meaning, fluency, terminology, style, structure, and release risk, then explains the result in approval language.
- •When a line needs judgment, it is surfaced as a decision with options, consequence, and a record.
- •The review layer supports final acceptance; it does not hide every risk behind an automatic score.
- •You can request changes after delivery and preserve the reasoning for future projects.
Four dimensions surfaced for approval
Review output is organized around the evidence an approver needs before final acceptance.
Meaning
Does the target preserve the source intent without omissions, additions, number errors, or distorted nuance?
Fluency
Does it read naturally for the target audience without awkward or literal phrasing?
Terminology
Are approved terms and product names consistent with the glossary and customer preferences?
Style and Risk
Does tone, register, format, and release risk match the agreed specification?
How the review loop works
Review runs as an agency control loop: check, explain, improve, and escalate only the decisions that need customer judgment.
Why visible review evidence matters
The goal is not to make customers read every segment. The goal is to make approval defensible.
Less review burden
The cockpit focuses attention on the lines that need judgment instead of forcing full rereads.
Decision-ready context
Each flagged issue includes why it matters, the proposed fix, and what happens if you accept it.
Consistent standard
The same agreed specification and glossary drive each pass, so review does not drift between handoffs.
Traceable report
What was found, changed, accepted, or left for judgment is preserved in the quality report.
What you receive
Delivery includes the translation plus the evidence needed for customer acceptance.
Quality evidence and report
Meaning, fluency, terminology, style, structure, and risk findings are summarized for approval.
Change history
Important corrections are logged with the reason and the point in the review loop.
Terminology record
Approved terms and reusable expressions are preserved for future work.
Acceptance-ready delivery
Files arrive with next action, feedback window, and final acceptance status clearly separated.